Back to use cases

Broker / agent FCPA vetting

FCPA-grade vetting of brokers, agents, distributors, intermediaries. One DueVestor report delivers the same depth as $30K–$100K agency engagements (Kroll, Control Risks, Mintz) for $199.

Who reads this

Anti-bribery and compliance leads at US-listed and EU-listed companies — anyone whose onboarding workflow has to survive a DOJ subpoena.

Three concrete scenarios

  1. 01

    A US-listed energy company onboarding a new distributor in Indonesia runs a DueVestor report before the first payment. The report flags two FCPA red flags — a PEP among the UBOs and a prior enforcement action — and the deal is restructured before it closes.

  2. 02

    An EU-listed industrial group rotating its distributor network in Latin America runs a report on every renewing broker. Two of forty distributors are declined on documented grounds; the rest are cleared with a cited evidence trail.

  3. 03

    A US biotech entering a new tier-3 transparency market needs an FCPA-aligned audit trail before any commission is paid. The report provides it: every finding cited, every owner screened, in under an hour.

Recommended report

The DueVestor report

Autonomous due diligence

Adaptive depth — short for a sparse subject, full wherever there are findings

Why intermediary vetting requires entity cascade

An FCPA-grade intermediary is not just a company — it is its UBOs, its directors, and its controlling shareholders. A compliance programme screens each of them. DueVestor’s cascade extracts the related parties from registry records and lets you run a report on each one at the same $199.

Illustrative scenario

The FCPA team would never have signed off on the broker network without an evidence trail like this. DueVestor’s report is the cleanest format we have seen.
— Head of Anti-Bribery, US-Listed Industrial B (illustrative)
Broker / agent FCPA vetting — DueVestor