Back to use cases

Broker / agent FCPA vetting

FCPA-grade vetting of brokers, agents, distributors, intermediaries. Type D delivers the same depth as $30K–$100K agency engagements (Kroll, Control Risks, Mintz) for $990.

Who reads this

Anti-bribery and compliance leads at US-listed and EU-listed companies — anyone whose onboarding workflow has to survive a DOJ subpoena.

Three concrete scenarios

  1. 01

    A US-listed energy company onboarding a new distributor in Indonesia runs a Type D before the first payment. The report flags two FCPA red flags simultaneously, escalating the case to the compliance committee.

  2. 02

    An EU-listed industrial group rotating its distributor network in Latin America runs Type D on every renewing broker. Two of forty distributors trigger PEP-adjacent findings and a refresh of the contract is required.

  3. 03

    A US biotech entering a new tier-3 transparency market needs an FCPA-aligned audit trail before any commission is paid. Type D fits the SEC Examiner's expected format.

Recommended report

FCPA-grade

Third-Party Vetting

FCPA-grade intermediary vetting

Why intermediary vetting requires entity cascade

An FCPA-grade intermediary is not just a company — it is its UBOs, its directors, and its controlling shareholders. A compliance program that doesn't auto-vet them risks a material false-clean. Type D now triggers an automatic cascade over every UBO and every director surfaced from OpenCorporates / Companies House / SEC EDGAR registries — no additional manual work. Industry-standard. Parity with Ethixbase360 and Refinitiv WorldCheck Enhanced.

What customers say

The FCPA team would never have signed off on the broker network without an evidence trail like this. DueVestor's Type D is the cleanest format I have seen.
Head of Anti-Bribery, US-Listed Industrial B
Broker / agent FCPA vetting — DueVestor